Supreme Court fixes 30-day period for continuation of criminal appeal after death of convict: The Supreme Court has noted that a criminal appeal filed by a convict will abate on his death if no application for leave to continue the appeal is made within 30 days by a near relative. The Division Bench of Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Aniruddha Bose observed that an amicus curiae who was appearing for deceased appellant cannot be treated as near relative for the purpose of continuance of appeal. The appellant in this case was an accused who was convicted by the Trial Court under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of his daughterin-law. The sentence was confirmed by the High Court and hence, the appeal has been filed. The appellant has died after being in jail for about 12 years. As per Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on the death of the appellant/convict the appeal is to abate. The proviso thereof carries an exception to the effect that a near relative may, within thirty days of the death of the appellant/convict, apply to the Appellate Court for leave to continue the appeal. The explanation to the said proviso defines ‘near relative’ to mean a parent, spouse, lineal descendant, brother or sister. In the present case, there is no application for leave to continue the appeal after the death of the appellant/convict, the Bench noted. Shikhil Suri, Counsel appearing as an Amicus Curiae appointed by the Top Court on behalf of the deceased appellant/convict has submitted that this is a very good case where there is every chance of the appellant being acquitted and considering the intention of the legislature in providing an appeal not abating even after the death of the appellant/convict, his oral prayer as an Amicus Curiae be considered as an application for continuance of this appeal and appeal be not abated. The appeal is governed by the substantive provision of law. Section 394 of the Cr.P.C..
top of page
bottom of page